Cancer vs. AIDS... Uh... I mean Bush vs. Kerry
The race may not be as bad as cancer vs. AIDS, but I still believe that it's a valid comparison. For example, Bush is like a big lump of stuff that started from nothing, slowly spread through Texas and eventually took over the United States (and it seems as if he wants to take over the entire world). Kerry, on the other hand, seems harmless because it takes awhile for symptoms to start forming, but once it starts to get out of control, it is bad.
All I am trying to show you through this extended metaphor is simply that neither choice is probably a good one. Bush is stupid and Kerry is deceptive.
I have a quick question to anyone reading this. Why the hell do people care about what the president thinks on so many issues? For example, abortion is a huge topic for most people voting, but in reality, the president has absolutely nothing to do with abortion. All the president does is sit in his office, get his knob slobbed by his secretaries, and try to make treaties and not go to war with countries. The rest of this shit is decided by congress, yet not to many people seem to give a fuck about that because you are all a bunch of morons.
Anyway... I was trying to think about what Ralph Nader would be and I came up with tapeworm. Don't ask me why, let's ask him:
Thank you, Ralph, for that interesting comment. I guess I'll be voting for myself again.
Comments? jeremiah@yourapathy.net
© 2004 by Jeremiah